Monday, May 25, 2020

Childhood Obesity And Its Effects - 1384 Words

Childhood obesity is on the rise and has seen a dramatic increase over recent years. The percent of children facing obesity today is 18% and has doubled over the course of 30 years.1 With 2/3 of the adult population being overweight and obese it is no surprise that children are following the trend. Obesity simply defined is excess body fat from an energy imbalance. Obesity occurs when energy intake is more than energy expended and results in excess body fat. Childhood obesity can be measured with the CDC BMI-for-age and sex growth chart. A BMI equal to or greater than the 95th percentile is considered obese. Childhood obesity is a significant problem because it leads to immediate health consequences such as high blood pressure, high†¦show more content†¦The cause for an energy imbalance in childhood obesity is typically due to a child consuming too many calories from nutrient-poor foods and not expending enough energy through physical activity. It appears that the simple equ ation to reverse obesity would be to reduce caloric intake and expend more energy, but obesity proves to be a much larger issue. When looking at the nutrition of children it is easy to see room for improvement and dietary recommendations by the AHA are not being met. Children are not meeting the daily recommendations for fruits and vegetables, whole grains, and dairy. Fruit consumption is increasing, but vegetable consumption is not and the most common vegetable eaten is white potatoes in the form of fries and chips.2 Children are replacing healthy foods with fat, sugar, and sodium. The consumption of nutrient-poor foods is providing children with little to no nutritional value, but a heavy calorie burden. Our society is set up perfectly against our health. Unhealthy food options are more accessible than healthy options. Children are faced with endless fast food options and vending machines full of sugar-sweetened beverages and packaged foods. Portion sizes have increased substantially over the past 30 years. Over the course of 20 years the serving size of fries has gone from 2.4 ounces to 6.9 ounces.3 Families are eating out more frequently and restaurant meals are higher in calorie and fat than home cooked meals. Children are often times

Friday, May 15, 2020

Purposes and Effects of the Electoral College

Since the United States Constitution was ratified, there have been five Presidential elections where the candidate who won the popular vote did not have enough Electoral College votes to be elected as President.  These elections were as follows:   1824 – John Quincy Adams defeated Andrew Jackson1876 – Rutherford B. Hayes defeated Samuel J. Tilden1888 – Benjamin Harrison defeated Grover Cleveland2000 – George W. Bush defeated Al Gore2016 – Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.It should be noted that there is a significant amount of evidence to question whether John F. Kennedy collected more popular votes than Richard M. Nixon in the 1960 election due to severe irregularities in Alabama voting results. The results of the 2016 election have brought forth a great deal of debate with respect to the continued viability of the Electoral College.  Ironically, a Senator from California (which is the largest U.S. state—and an important consideration in this debate) has filed legislation in an attempt to start the process necessary to amend the U.S. Constitution to ensure that the winner of the popular vote becomes the President-elect—but is that truly what was contemplated by the intent of the founding fathers of the United States? The Committee of Eleven and the Electoral College In 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention were extremely divided about how the President of the newly formed country should be elected, and this issue was sent to the Committee of Eleven on Postponed Matters.  This Committee of Elevens purpose was to resolve issues that could not be agreed upon by all the members.  In establishing the Electoral College, the Committee of Eleven attempted to resolve the conflict between state rights and federalism issues.   While the Electoral College provides that U.S. citizens could participate by voting, it also gave protection to the rights of the smaller and less populous states by giving each state one Elector for each of the two U.S. Senators as well as for each member of the U.S. State of Representatives.  The workings of the Electoral College also achieved a goal of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention that the U.S. Congress would not have any input in the Presidential election whatsoever. Federalism in America   In order to understand why the Electoral College was devised, it is important to acknowledge that under the U.S. Constitution, both the federal government and the individual states share very specific powers. One of the most important concepts from the Constitution is Federalism, which, in 1787, was extremely innovative. Federalism arose as a means to exclude the weaknesses and hardships of both a unitary system and a confederation James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers that the U.S. system of government is neither wholly national nor wholly federal. Federalism was the result of years of being oppressed by the British and deciding that the U.S. government would be grounded on specified rights; while at the same time the founding fathers did not want to make the same mistake that had been made under the Articles of Confederation where essentially each individual state was its’ own sovereignty and could override the laws of the Confederation. Arguably, the issue of state rights versus a strong federal government ended shortly after the America Civil War and the post-war period of Reconstruction. Since then, the U.S. political scene has been made up of two separate and ideologically distinct major partisan groups – the Democratic and Republican Parties. In addition, there are a number of third or otherwise independent parties. The Effect of the Electoral College on Voter Turnout U.S national elections have a significant history of voter apathy, which over the last several decades show that only about 55 to 60 percent of those eligible will actually vote.  An August 2016 study by the Pew Research Center  ranks the U.S. voter turnout at 31 out of 35 countries with a democratic government. Belgium had the highest rate at 87 percent, Turkey was second at 84 percent and Sweden was third at 82 percent. A strong argument can be made that U.S. voter turnout in Presidential elections stems from the fact that, due to the Electoral College, every vote does not count. In the 2016 election, Clinton had 8,167,349 votes to Trump’s 4,238,545 in California which has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1992. In addition, Trump had 4,683,352 votes to Clinton’s 3,868,291 in Texas which has voted Republican in every Presidential election since 1980. Further, Clinton had 4,149,500 votes to Trump’s 2,639,994 in New York which has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1988. California, Texas and New York are the three most populated states and have a combined 122 Electoral College votes. The statistics support the argument of many that under the present Electoral College system, a Republican presidential vote in California or New York does not matter, just as a Democratic presidential vote in Texas does not matter. These are only three examples, but the same can be stated as true in the predominantly Democratic New England states and the historically Republican Southern states. It is entirely probable that voter apathy in the United States is due to the belief held by many citizens that their vote will not have any effect on the outcome of the Presidential election. Campaign Strategies and the Electoral College When looking at the popular vote, another consideration should be campaign strategies and finances. Taking into consideration the historical vote of a particular state, a presidential candidate may decide to avoid campaigning and or advertising in that state. Instead, they will make more appearances in states that are more evenly divided and can be won to add onto the number of Electoral votes which are required to win the Presidency.   One final issue to consider when weighing the merits of the Electoral College is when does the U.S. Presidential vote become final. The popular vote occurs on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November every fourth even year that is divisible by four; then the Electors of the Electoral College meet in their home states on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December of the same year, and it isn’t until January 6th immediately following the election that the joint session of Congress counts and certifies the votes. However, this seems to be moot seeing that during the 20th Century, in eight different Presidential elections, there has been a sole elector who did not vote consistent with that Elector’s states popular vote. In other words, the results on election night reflect the final electoral college vote.   In every election where the individual who lost the popular vote was voted in, there have been calls for ending the Electoral College. Obviously, this would not affect the outcome of the 2016 election but it could have an impact on future elections, some of which might be unforeseen.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Mlb And Steroids Is Not An Enforcement Agent - 1583 Words

Mlb and steroids Introduction This presentation will be evaluating and answering the following questions: †¢ Could MLB argue that it is not an enforcement agent, and it has no way of determining whether every player is using steroids at any given time? †¢ Does this argument excuse any responsibility on the part of MLB? †¢ Do you see any rationalizations for the steroid use or the lack of an effective policy on its use in MLB? †¢ What is the responsibility of MLB and the players to young people who are using steroids? †¢ Discuss the Canseco allegations that MLB just wanted revenue and turned a blind eye to steroid use. Apply the various social responsibility theories to this point and discuss the flaws in this competitive model No! The MLB could not argue that it is not an enforcement agent, due to the fact that Congress was already investigating all sports, and found out at every level, drugs were being used. Chairman Staggers did not want the information leaked out to the public being worried that it would increase the amount of teenagers using steroids. The Committee Chairman went to â€Å"the †¦Baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn to consider instituting tough penalties and testing, and he trusted Commissioner Kuhn to do that† (Jennings, 2012, p. 139). In spite of this, three decades went by and the MLB did not regulate itself as agreed, and not one drug test was administered. This caused an ethical dilemma. It was not until the early 90’s that the current baseball commissions finallyShow MoreRelatedBaseball: the American Pastime in the Dominican Republic1926 Words   |  8 PagesTen Years’ War and brought baseball to the Dominican Republic (D.R.), the sport is thriving in the imp overished nation. In the sport’s top professional league, Major League Baseball (MLB), more current players were born in the Dominican Republic than any other country besides the United States, where 29 of the 30 MLB teams are based (Gregory 2010). The Dominican, a nation of 9.7 million that lies 700 miles southeast of the port of Miami, produced 86 of the 833 major league players on the opening-dayRead MorePete Rose Essay3071 Words   |  13 PagesSeries and the Yankees 4-0 in the World Series (Sports Reference, Inc). The 1976 Reds remain the only team since the expansion of the playoffs in 1969 to go undefeated in the post-season (as of the end of the 2006 season). In 1979 Rose became a free agent and signed a four-year, $3.2 million contract with the Philadelphia Phillies, temporarily making him the highest-paid athlete in team sports (Sports Reference, Inc). In the eighty-six years before Rose arrived and twenty-two years after he departed

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Essentials To Managerial Accounting Engage -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Essentials To Managerial Accounting Engage? Answer: Introduction: This case is about Hawthorn Leisure Works which offers tennis court and other physical fitness facilities to its members. Their revenue is from membership fee and court fee. They want to change their fee structure and regarding that an analysis need to be done in comparison to their old plan. They want to analyse as if new plan regarding fee structure will help to improve the revenue or not (Lalli, 2011). They are planning to remove the court fees from their revenue structure and merge the student segment with the individual segment. There were total 2000 members in the old plan and 70% of those members will continue their membership in the new plan. The new plan consist of only the membership fee and no court fee is there in the new plan. They are estimating that the court fee will be recovered by them with their new plan within six months of the implementation. They further estimate that the new plan will increase the revenue as compared to the old plan. A complete analysis is made regarding the revenues of the HLWs in their old plan as well in their new plan (Heisinger, 2009) Annual membership fees(old plan) Individual $ 45.00 Student $ 30.00 Family $ 100.00 Total Members 2000 Family 1000 Individual 500 Student 500 10 Courts and 12 hours per day Peak tennis season October to April Court fees Days 181 Capacity (5pm to 9pm) 90%-100% Avg. 95% $12 per hour Capacity(9am to 4pm) 50%-60% Avg. 55% $8 per hour Off season May to September Days 184 Court usage(Capacity) 20%-40% Avg. 30% $ 6 per hour Old Plan( Revenue) Amount Membership Fees Individual $ 22,500.00 Student $ 15,000.00 Family $ 1,00,000.00 Court Fees Peak Season 5pm-9pm $ 82,536.00 9am-4pm $ 63,712.00 Off Season $ 39,744.00 Total Revenue $ 3,23,492.00 New Plan of annual membership fees Individual $ 300.00 Family $ 500.00 Promotional( for complete year) Individual $ 250.00 Family $ 450.00 New Plan (Revenue) Amount Membership Fees Normal Individual $ 75,000.00 Family $ 1,25,000.00 Promotional Individual $ 1,12,500.00 Family $ 2,02,500.00 Total Revenue $ 5,15,000.00 Yes, the new membership plan and fee structure improve the ability to plan the cash receipts as under the new plan the membership fee is only there and no court fee is there as any member can use the court at any time without paying any fee. Although the no. of members in the new plan have decreased from 2000 to 1700 but still the revenue increased in comparison to old plan. The increase in revenue will improve the fee structure and the new plan is worthy for company. (Johnson, 2014). The sales revenue will increase resulting from the planned change in the fee structure for next financial year (Drury, 2005). They changed their revenue structure as earlier the revenue was from membership fee and court fee and in the new plan the revenue is only from the membership fee but still there is considerable increase in the revenue with the implementation of new plan. The sales revenue under old plan was $ 3, 23,492.00 and the sales revenue under new plan $ 5, 15,000.00. The assumption made by me is regarding the calculation of court fees as the percentage range is given for the occupancy of the court. So, I took the average of the given range. As either we need to take any of the upper or lower range or average of the range one fixed criteria need to be followed. HLW should accept the new plan as the revenue will increase and the complexity of managing the fee structure will decrease on part of the management. The members will also be happy as there will be no separate fee regarding court usage (Clowes Scriven, 2015). The fall in the no. of members will be combat by the new fee structure very soon as the membership fee increased as compared to the old plan. Conclusion: As per the analysis being done regarding the acceptance of new plan or continuing with the old plan it is recommended to accept the new plan as the revenue got increased (Barney, 2014). The revenue under old plan was $ 323492 and the revenue as per the new plan is $ 515000. The benefit is clearly there and no other contention is required to support the new plan. References: Barney, J. B. 2014,Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Pearson Higher Ed. Clowes, R Scriven, V 2015, Budgeting: A Practical Approach, Pearson Higher Education AU. Drury, C 2005, Management Accounting for Business, Cengage Learning EMEA. Goektuerk, H 2007, Activity Based Costing (ABC) - Advantages and Disadvantages, GRIN Verlag. Heisinger, K 2009, Essentials to Managerial Accounting, Cengage Learning. Johnson, P. F. 2014,Purchasing and Supply Management, McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Lalli, W. R. 2011, Handbook of Budgeting, John Wiley Sons. Potts, Keith, and Ankrah, N 2014,Construction Cost Management: learning from case studies, Routledge. Wiese, N 2009, Activity Based Costing, GRIN Verlag.